By today, I mean our milieu, which includes individuals of the last philosophical generation. Even if now deceased, they still influence our culture in 2013. An example on the mysticism side of the war is C. S. Lewis (1898-1963), whose writings Christians still cite.
By advocate of reason I mean someone who speaks informatively of reason, as a fact, and for reason, as a value. The advocate, when speaking of reason, can explain the basic mechanisms of reason and illustrate it with example applications.
INDIVIDUALS. The following
individuals are candidates. They are worth investigating, according to my own
reading or the recommendations by some of my associates on Facebook. Are they
actually advocates of reason, and reason alone? Only further research will
tell.
Brand Blandshard (1892-1987)
was "an American philosopher known primarily for his defense of
reason." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_Blanshard)
W. T. Jones (1910-1998) was a
professor of philosophy at the California Institute of Technology. He was the
author of the five-volume History of Western Philosophy series. In
his books, he defended reason, mostly in scattered passages.
Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011),
one of the "New Atheists," was a purported defender of reason.
Sam Harris (b. 1967), one of
the "New Atheists," is a purported defender of reason, but (I would
say, tentatively) is actually a defender of secular forms of mysticism such as the
notions of intuition and innate ideas.
Richard Dawkins (b. 1941), one
of the "New Atheists," is a purported defender of reason.
Daniel Dennett (b. 1942), one
of the "New Atheists," is a purported defender of reason.
One or more of
my Facebook associates also recommended the following individuals as advocates
of reason in the USA today. However, initially I have found no information
showing that these individuals are indeed advocates, part-time or full-time, of
reason and opponents of mysticism in the USA today. I welcome specific
references to their writings, references that point out books, essays, chapters
or even merely passages in which they explain the nature of reason,
call for its exclusive use as a source of knowledge, and reject mysticism.
Thomas Sowell (b. 1930) is an
author, sociologist, and economist writing in the USA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell.
Antal Fekete (b. 1932) is an author,
economist, and professor of mathematics (Canada) who is active internationally:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antal_E._Fekete.
Eliyahu M. Goldratt (1947-2011),
the author of Theory of Constraints and other fiction and
nonfiction works, was a business consultant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Goldratt.
James (Jim) C. Collins (b. 1957),
author of Good to Last, is a business consultant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_C._Collins.
ORGANIZATIONS. The following
organizations, apparently all institutions, seem to support reason, at least
judging from their names and self-descriptions. Do they actually support
reason? Do they advocate reason and reason alone as the means of gaining
knowledge of the world?
Reason Foundation (founded in
1978 by Robert W. Poole, Jr.; Manuel S. Klausner; and Tibor Machan). The founders
of Reason magazine
published their first issue in 1968. "Reason Foundation
is a nonprofit organization advancing free minds and free markets. . . . Reason
Foundation's mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying, and
promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets,
and the rule of law." The headquarters of the foundation is in Los
Angeles. (http://reason.org/about) Initial
sources: http://reason.org/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason_Foundation
The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
(founded in 2006) has this purpose: "The
mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support
scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the
natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition,
intolerance and suffering." Initial sources: http://richarddawkinsfoundation.org/mission
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins_Foundation_for_Reason_and_Science
Project Reason (founded in 2007
by Sam Harris and Annaka Harris) says its purpose is to spread "scientific
knowledge and secular values in society." Further, "Project Reason
seeks to encourage critical thinking and wise public policy through a variety
of interrelated projects." By what means will the Project achieve its
goals? "The foundation will convene conferences, produce films, sponsor
scientific studies and opinion polls, publish original research, award grants
to other charitable organizations, and offer material support to religious
dissidents and public intellectuals—all with the purpose of eroding the
influence of dogmatism, superstition, and bigotry in our world." A special
focus of the foundation is countering religious dogmatism with critical
thinking. (project-reason.org/about) Initial sources: http://www.project-reason.org/
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Reason
INITIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. MOVEMENTS
Ari Armstrong,
"Atheism Rises in U.S.—But What About Reason?," posted August 25,
2012 in the weblog of The
Objective Standard. http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/blog/index.php/2012/08/atheism-rises-in-u-s-but-what-about-reason/
Alan Germani,
"The Mystical Ethics of the New Atheists," The Objective Standard, Vol.
3, No. 3. http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2008-fall/mystical-ethics-new-atheists.asp
2. ORGANIZATIONS
"Reason
Foundation." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason_Foundation
"Reason
Foundation." http://reason.org/
"The
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science." http://richarddawkinsfoundation.org/
"The
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins_Foundation_for_Reason_and_Science
"Project
Reason." http://www.project-reason.org/
"Project
Reason." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Reason
3. INDIVIDUALS
"Sam Harris
(Author)." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Harris_(author)
Ari Armstrong,
"Sam Harris Can Sound Like an Egoist; Too Bad He Isn't One," posted
December 23, 2012 in the weblog of The
Objective Standard. http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/blog/index.php/2012/12/sam-harris-can-sound-like-an-egoist-too-bad-he-isnt-one/
Ari Armstrong,
"Sam Harris's Failure to Formulate a Scientific Morality, " The Objective Standard, Vol.
7, No. 4. http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2012-winter/sam-harris-unscientific-morality.asp
Ari Armstrong,
"Sam Harris Couldn't Help But Smear Ayn Rand," posted May 17, 2012 in
the weblog of The Objective Standard.
http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/blog/index.php/2012/05/sam-harris-couldnt-help-but-smear-ayn-rand/
"Sam
Harris." http://www.samharris.org/
Ari Armstrong, "Sam
Harris Pointedly Defends Free Speech," posted September 22, 2012 in the
weblog of The Objective Standard. http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/blog/index.php/2012/09/sam-harris-pointedly-defends-free-speech/
Suggestions for additions, deletions, or modifications are welcome in the comment thread.
Burgess Laughlin
Author, The Power and the Glory: They Key Ideas and Crusading Lives of Eight Debaters of Reason vs. Faith, http://www.reasonversusmysticism.com/
Adam Reed has mention that scientist Steven Weinberg might be a candidate for advocate of reason. He fights for the "hard realism" side of the "Science Wars," which means the side that actually, if not in these words, fights for the idea that there is one natural world and that reason is the way to know it.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Weinberg